News

We are truly honored to announce that the leading specialist guide IP Stars in 2022 has ranked Petersona Patents – AAA Law among one of the most recommended…

Currently Unitary patent protection system is not in force yet. The whole intellectual property world now waits for Germany to deposit its instrument of ratification of the Agreement…

Introduction The activities of infamous trademark troll Michael Gleissner, as well as those of the companies that can be linked to him, have been covered extensively. In Latvia,…

Every day we are deeply saddened by the news of the military attack against Ukraine. Our thoughts are with the Ukrainian people. As a pan-Baltic law firm, Pētersona…

Our client BIGBANK AS in 2020 filed a trademark application for different bank financial services in class 36, however it was followed by a partial refusal allowing the…

Following the amendments to the Customs Law and the Cabinet of Ministers’ Regulations Concerning Certain Types of Customs Control, noteworthy changes came into force as of 1 September…

In 2020 the British company Orange Brands Services Limited (the Plaintiff) brought an action against Smart Orange, SIA (the Defendant) claiming infringement of trademark rights and non-material damage.…

Continuously we have relied on the findings of the case-law established by the Supreme Court (Judgment of 9 May 2001 in Case No. SKC 239/2001 and Judgment of…

– The word mark “Ekstra” lacks inherent distinctiveness, as it denotes something more than the required standard and associates with the qualities of being bigger and better than…

Recently the World Trademark Review (WTR) in cooperation with PĒTERSONA PATENTS – AAA LAW  published an article on transformation by the activities of millionaire serial filer Michael Gleissner,…

In 2019 our client CTBAT International Co. Limited (the Defendant) filed a notice of opposition with the Board of Appeal against the registration of the trademark XISHANGXI (fig.)…

On 27 September 2019 the Polish company MS Trademarks Sp.z.o.o. (the Plaintiff) filed an application for revocation on the basis of non-use against the IR No. WO 706285…

In order to provide you with the best possible browsing experience we uses cookies. To accept our cookie policy please click „Accept“ button or continue to the site. Leaving the site will be interpreted as not accepting the policy. You can always revoke this authorization by changing setting in your browser and deleting the cookies.